Suomi - Ohjelmatuotteet ja tietojärjestelmät - Rekrytointijärjestelmä, Pohjois-Savon hyvinvointialue

different companies won its awards

31

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

13%

of its calls state an estimated value

26%

Based on 32 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

8.3

of those lots received a single tender

5%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

6%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Finland · Software & IT systems

different companies won awards here

152

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

8%

buyers awarded contracts here

101

Based on 193 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.3

of those lots received a single tender

20%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

13%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.