Suomi - Ohjelmistojen ylläpito- ja korjauspalvelut - Jälki-ilmoitus FACNAV-järjestelmän ylläpidosta ja ohjelmistolisenssien päivityksistä 2026-2027

different companies won its awards

69

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

12%

of its calls state an estimated value

61%

Based on 78 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.3

of those lots received a single tender

24%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

15%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Finland · IT services

different companies won awards here

310

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

10%

buyers awarded contracts here

246

Based on 499 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.5

of those lots received a single tender

10%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

7%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.