Suomi - Mainonta- ja markkinointipalvelut - Digitaalisen markkinoinnin palvelut Oulun yliopistolle

different companies won its awards

18

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

21%

of its calls state an estimated value

20%

Based on 19 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.3

of those lots received a single tender

15%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

29%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Finland · Business services

different companies won awards here

279

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

13%

buyers awarded contracts here

227

Based on 387 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

6.6

of those lots received a single tender

8%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

3%

of the tenders came from another country

19%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.