Suomi - Tietotekniset palvelut: neuvonta, ohjelmistojen kehittäminen, Internet ja tuki - Senaatti-kiinteistöt - Microsoft-teknologioihin pohjautuvien digitaalisten palveluiden kehitys- ja ylläpitohankinta

different companies won its awards

30

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

19%

of its calls state an estimated value

25%

Based on 36 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.0

of those lots received a single tender

3%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Finland · IT services

different companies won awards here

311

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

10%

buyers awarded contracts here

246

Based on 502 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.4

of those lots received a single tender

10%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

8%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.