Finland - Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services - Service alliance for railway sections 2, 3 and 4 of the ERTMS programme, design procurement

different companies won its awards

76

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

20%

of its calls state an estimated value

12%

Based on 116 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.4

of those lots received a single tender

8%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Finland · Architecture & engineering services

different companies won awards here

278

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

11%

buyers awarded contracts here

173

Based on 376 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

6.7

of those lots received a single tender

2%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.