Purchase of small IT equipment

different companies won its awards

10

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

36%

of its calls state an estimated value

75%

Based on 11 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.1

of those lots received a single tender

11%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

10%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Estonia · Office & computing machinery

different companies won awards here

59

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

29%

buyers awarded contracts here

45

Based on 130 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.7

of those lots received a single tender

20%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.