Eppendors Technical Equipment

different companies won its awards

105

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

9%

of its calls state an estimated value

6%

Based on 128 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

of the awards went to companies based in another country

47%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Austria · Laboratory & precision equipment

different companies won awards here

236

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

8%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

178 of 198

buyers awarded contracts here

76

Based on 374 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.6

of those lots received a single tender

59%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

40%

of the tenders came from another country

31%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.