Skip to content
Aperlena
Language:

Belgium - Economic research services - Comparative study on best practices for a stronger EU sanction enforcement

Awarded Contract award No deadline published
Watch this tender

Bidding is closed. An award or a correction on this notice: an email when the register sees it. Log in

  1. Awarded
  2. Published

Description

Restrictive measures (sanctions) are an essential tool for the promotion of the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. Their objectives include safeguarding the Union’s values, maintaining international peace and security, consolidating and supporting democracy, the rule of law and human rights. The sanctions remain the main instrument in the Union’s toolbox to deter, prevent and condemn aggressive and illiberal behaviour of the third countries. Considering that the lack of sanction implementation, as well as inconsistencies across different jurisdictions of the Union, also represent a risk to Union financial interests and to the national financial systems, it is important to make sure that the Union sanctions are implemented equally across the Union. This is particularly relevant for the implementation of the Union sanctions against Russia, which have been subsequently adopted starting from 2014. In order to curb circumvention of Union sanctions and assist the Member States in their sanction implementation tasks, this pilot project concerns a study on the best practices and synergies that would benefit the Union’s sanction policy, taking stock of the examples of the United States’ Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the United Kingdom sanctions enforcement authority (OFSI). This would help to identify similarities, disparities, best practices and missing elements across all the jurisdictions of the Union. Considering that each Member State nominates a very different set and number of national authorities for the enforcement of Union sanctions (currently at least 160 officially designated), it would be useful to see to what extent having a centralised sanction implementation body would benefit Union sanction implementation, as compared to a network of scattered national bodies. Such a study would help to identify a way for reducing ‘avoidable’ sanction evasion, namely in terms of asset freeze and confiscation and visa and travel bans.

Official source

Source: TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU)

Always verify details on the official notice.

Last verified against TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU) 1 month ago

View the official notice

More from this buyer

Full buyer profile

Recent awards

Change history

Every time an official source republished this notice with different content. We watch every source we index, including regional copies of the same notice.

  1. Read before bidding
    • Estimated value: Set to €500,000
    • Award date: Awarded on November 12, 2025
    • Estimated value: Set to €500,000

Follow this tender and we email you the moment it changes. Create account

Similar tenders

Market context

Avg. open tender · Business services
€19,029,724
6,621 open across Europe right now 97% below sector average
Buyer track record on Aperlena
3 notices tracked · 1 awarded
€427,948 in awarded contracts

Never miss a tender like this

241 new notices in Business services in Belgium in the last 7 days. Get an email when new ones appear. Free.

Set up my alert
Source

Keyboard shortcuts

Read a list without reaching for the mouse. The shortcuts stay quiet while you type in a field.

j
Next result
k
Previous result
Enter
Open the result
n
Next page
p
Previous page
c
Compare this result
s
Shortlist this result
/
Jump to the search box
?
Show these shortcuts
Esc
Close