Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Centralny Szpital Kliniczny Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Łodzi
442 notices in the register, 14 open now. 308 contracts awarded, worth €54.4M in all.
Main sectors Medical equipment & pharmaceuticals 186, Repair & maintenance services 182, Construction work 17, Office & computing machinery 10, Software & IT systems 9, Business services 6
Record
Awards by year
- 2026 21 awards €8.1M
- 2025 8 awards €21.6M
- €1.0M
- €10.0M
- largest, €14.0M
- value not published
Each dot is one award, placed on its date and sized by its value.
Relations
Who wins with this buyer
- NAMEDALL Serwis Aparatury Medycznej Marek Kwiatkowski 16 contracts €3,321
- bioMérieux Polska Sp. z o.o. 4 contracts €269,554
- Argenta Sp. z o.o. 4 contracts €219,784
- PROMA SERVICE Jacek Żarczyński 3 contracts €7,533
- MEDTRONIC POLAND SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ; YPSOMED POLSKA SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ; NEUCA SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA 2 contracts €3,314,632
- Philips Polska Sp. z o.o. 2 contracts €785,487
- SIEMENS HEALTHCARE Sp. z o.o. 2 contracts €556,889
- Sysmex Polska Sp. z o.o. 2 contracts €164,062
Shares of the 143 awards this buyer made to a named company.
Practice
How it buys
Publishing rhythm
Publishes most in January and July.
Next likely wave: January 2027.
- Typical contract value
- €299,726
- Median of the last 8 priced notices
Based on 442 notices over the last 24 months.
What to expect from this buyer
Measured in its busiest sector Medical equipment & pharmaceuticals
- Typical final price against the published estimate
- -20.6%
Medians across the 98 comparable awards this buyer made in this sector over the last 5 years. Each figure uses the awards that publish the dates or values it needs.
Next 90 days
Coming up from this buyer
- tenders announced in advance (last 6 months)
- 0
- contracts due back on the market in the next 90 days
- 3
Scorecard
The buyer in figures
How it runs its calls for tender
- usual bidding window
- 18 days
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 0%
Estimates over its calls for tender of the last 3 years, bidding windows over the last 2. Deadline extensions only where the source updates a notice in place (TED publishes corrections as separate notices, so its buyers show none).
Who wins its contracts
Many suppliers- different companies won its awards
- 110
- of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
- 17%
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 0%
Based on 143 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.
Competition
- tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)
- 1.6
- of those lots received a single tender
- 59%
- of the awards went to companies based in another country
- 2%
As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.
Register