Powiat Pruszkowski
108 notices in the register, 5 open now. 46 contracts awarded, worth €6.3M in all.
Main sectors Architecture & engineering services 32, Construction work 25, Agricultural & forestry services 9, Environment, sewage & cleaning 7, Financial & insurance services 6, Office & computing machinery 6
Record
Awards by year
- 2026 9 awards €2.7M
- 2025 2 awards €1.7M
- €100,000
- €1.0M
- largest, €1.2M
Each dot is one award, placed on its date and sized by its value.
Relations
Who wins with this buyer
- MT-PROJEKT SPÓŁKA Z OGRANICZONĄ ODPOWIEDZIALNOŚCIĄ 4 contracts €282,144
- Bank Spółdzielczy w Raszynie; Bank Spółdzielczy w Sochaczewie 2 contracts €1,921,782
- South Stream S.A. 2 contracts €445,663
- Powiat Pruszkowski 1 contract €1,199,456
- PROTAB KOWALCZUK I WSPOLNICY SPOLKA JAWNA 1 contract €1,005,506
- Energia Polska Sp. z o.o. 1 contract €516,405
- EKOTEKTURA Sp. z o.o. 1 contract €379,600
- NTT Poland sp. z o.o; ITD24 Sp. z o. o. Ul. Jasna 10A; INTEGRIZ SP. Z O.O. 1 contract €230,449
Shares of the 38 awards this buyer made to a named company.
Practice
How it buys
Publishing rhythm
Publishes most in May and April.
Next likely wave: April 2027.
- Typical contract value
- €313,237
- Median of the last 16 priced notices
Based on 108 notices over the last 24 months.
What to expect from this buyer
Measured in its busiest sector Architecture & engineering services
- Typical final price against the published estimate
- -29%
Medians across the 10 comparable awards this buyer made in this sector over the last 5 years. Each figure uses the awards that publish the dates or values it needs.
Next 90 days
Coming up from this buyer
- tenders announced in advance (last 6 months)
- 0
- contracts due back on the market in the next 90 days
- 2
Scorecard
The buyer in figures
How it runs its calls for tender
- usual bidding window
- 14 days
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 10%
Estimates over its calls for tender of the last 3 years, bidding windows over the last 2. Deadline extensions only where the source updates a notice in place (TED publishes corrections as separate notices, so its buyers show none).
Who wins its contracts
Many suppliers- different companies won its awards
- 33
- of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
- 21%
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 10%
Based on 38 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.
Competition
- of the awards went to companies based in another country
- 0%
As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.
Register