Przeprowadzenie audytu bezpieczeństwa informacji w ramach zadania pn. „CYBERBEZPIECZNY URZĄD MIEJSKI W ŚWIDNICY”

different companies won its awards

20

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

41%

of its calls state an estimated value

6%

Based on 29 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.6

of those lots received a single tender

0%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Poland · IT services

different companies won awards here

1,221

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

9%

buyers awarded contracts here

1,142

Based on 2,625 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.4

of those lots received a single tender

57%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

2%

of the tenders came from another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.