Poland - Design documentation for expansion of energy generation sources and networks

different companies won its awards

64

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

10%

of its calls state an estimated value

56%

Based on 69 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.3

of those lots received a single tender

85%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Poland · Architecture & engineering services

different companies won awards here

3,906

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

1%

buyers awarded contracts here

2,358

Based on 6,505 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.4

of those lots received a single tender

23%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.