Eesti - Süsteemanalüüsi ja programmeerimisteenused - Infosüsteemi POLIS MISX seiremooduli ja objektide seoste registri analüüsi- ning arendustööde II etapp

different companies won its awards

31

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

24%

of its calls state an estimated value

100%

Based on 38 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

5.4

of those lots received a single tender

27%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

29%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Estonia · IT services

different companies won awards here

151

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

13%

buyers awarded contracts here

68

Based on 288 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.0

of those lots received a single tender

19%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

8%

of the tenders came from another country

53%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.