Invitation documents for an open electronic tender below EU thresholds for the supply of equipment

different companies won its awards

74

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

10%

of its calls state an estimated value

100%

Based on 80 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Greece · Electrical machinery

different companies won awards here

757

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

3%

buyers awarded contracts here

397

Based on 895 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.7

of those lots received a single tender

56%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

of the tenders came from another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.