Suomi - Tutkimus- ja kehityspalvelut ja niihin liittyvät konsulttipalvelut - Neurokirurginen vertaiskehittäminen

different companies won its awards

45

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

17%

of its calls state an estimated value

2%

Based on 54 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.2

of those lots received a single tender

22%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

13%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Finland · Research & development

different companies won awards here

51

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

14%

buyers awarded contracts here

31

Based on 59 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

5.7

of those lots received a single tender

22%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

6%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.