Call for expressions of interest for conducting a comprehensive osteological study

different companies won its awards

516

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

2%

of its calls state an estimated value

99%

Based on 572 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Greece · Architecture & engineering services

different companies won awards here

1,001

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

1%

buyers awarded contracts here

492

Based on 1,079 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.2

of those lots received a single tender

48%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

3%

of the tenders came from another country

5%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.