Call for interest - Suction machines, central venous catheter

different companies won its awards

51

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

19%

of its calls state an estimated value

100%

Based on 72 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Greece · Medical equipment & pharmaceuticals

different companies won awards here

2,991

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

5%

buyers awarded contracts here

496

Based on 8,114 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.9

of those lots received a single tender

54%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

7%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.