Poland - Social research services - Pilot and validation study of tools for monitoring and supporting education accessibility

different companies won its awards

28

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

22%

of its calls state an estimated value

52%

Based on 32 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.6

of those lots received a single tender

64%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Poland · Business services

different companies won awards here

2,334

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

2%

buyers awarded contracts here

1,605

Based on 4,015 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.0

of those lots received a single tender

21%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

4%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.