Poland - Network equipment - Expansion of network infrastructure for the courts of the Warsaw Court of Appeal

different companies won its awards

20

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

26%

of its calls state an estimated value

0%

Based on 23 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.1

of those lots received a single tender

22%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Poland · Radio, TV & communication equipment

different companies won awards here

807

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

3%

buyers awarded contracts here

738

Based on 1,354 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.1

of those lots received a single tender

47%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.