Pašvaldības nozīmes koplietošanas ūdensnotekas, meliorācijas atjaunošana Odukalnā, Ķekavas pagastā, Ķekavas novadā

different companies won its awards

18

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

38%

of its calls state an estimated value

2%

Based on 26 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.8

of those lots received a single tender

19%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Construction work

different companies won awards here

399

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

7%

buyers awarded contracts here

118

Based on 1,050 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.9

of those lots received a single tender

12%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.