MARCHE INFOGERANCE INFORMATIQUE

different companies won its awards

19

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

29%

of its calls state an estimated value

20%

Based on 24 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

France · Office & computing machinery

different companies won awards here

716

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

12%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

518 of 591

buyers awarded contracts here

1,030

Based on 1,452 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.2

of those lots received a single tender

16%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.