Ireland - Social research services - Literature review and empirical analyses of AI exposure and productivity - 250001/7796

different companies won its awards

33

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

17%

of its calls state an estimated value

100%

Based on 36 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

of the awards went to companies based in another country

91%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Ireland · Business services

different companies won awards here

652

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

5%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

381 of 449

buyers awarded contracts here

245

Based on 979 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

11.5

of those lots received a single tender

12%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

20%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.