Direct award procedure for the provision of technical inspection (KTEO) services for KARD vehicles

different companies won its awards

60

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

14%

of its calls state an estimated value

99%

Based on 74 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.3

of those lots received a single tender

33%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

15%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.