AMO CPE CHAUFFAGE

different companies won its awards

18

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

29%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

13 of 14

of its calls state an estimated value

18%

Based on 21 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

France · Architecture & engineering services

different companies won awards here

7,310

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

3%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

4,969 of 5,677

buyers awarded contracts here

4,641

Based on 12,730 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

6.4

of those lots received a single tender

6%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

5%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.