INSTYTUT AGROFIZYKI IM.BOHDANA DOBRZAŃSKIEGO POLSKIEJ AKADEMII NAUK
133 notices in the register, 1 open now. 57 contracts awarded, worth €1.3M in all.
Main sectors Laboratory & precision equipment 83, Medical equipment & pharmaceuticals 16, Office & computing machinery 15, Leather & textile materials 7, Mining & construction machinery 4, Electrical machinery 2
Record
Awards by year
- 2026 14 awards €953,950
- 2025 8 awards €312,092
- €50,000
- €500,000
- largest, €575,715
Each dot is one award, placed on its date and sized by its value.
Relations
Who wins with this buyer
- Alchem Grupa Sp. z o.o. 5 contracts €30,820
- LPP Equipment Sp. Z o.o. 2 contracts €132,698
- Anton Paar Poland Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością 2 contracts €74,144
- Ejsak Group Sp. z o. o. 2 contracts
- RESET-PC Wojciech Kondratowicz-Kucewicz i Adam Zams Spółka Jawna 2 contracts
- JACEK MALINOWSKI Genore chromatografia Dr Jacek Malinowski 2 contracts
- BioMaxima S.A. 2 contracts
- TEWA IT Mirosław Onyszko 2 contracts
Shares of the 47 awards this buyer made to a named company.
Practice
How it buys
Publishing rhythm
Publishes most in July and September.
Next likely wave: July 2027.
- Typical contract value
- €24,070
- Median of the last 25 priced notices
Based on 133 notices over the last 24 months.
What to expect from this buyer
Measured in its busiest sector Laboratory & precision equipment
- awarded, as a share of the estimate (median)
- 98%
- half between 87% and 100%, from 19 awards
Medians across the 28 comparable awards this buyer made in this sector over the last 5 years. Each figure uses the awards that publish the dates or values it needs.
Scorecard
The buyer in figures
How it runs its calls for tender
- usual bidding window
- 11 days
- of followed deadlines were extended
- 0%
- 0 of 10
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 0%
Estimates over its calls for tender of the last 3 years, bidding windows over the last 2. Deadline extensions only where the source updates a notice in place (TED publishes corrections as separate notices, so its buyers show none).
Who wins its contracts
Many suppliers- different companies won its awards
- 36
- of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
- 19%
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 0%
Based on 47 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.
Competition
- tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)
- 1.2
- of those lots received a single tender
- 79%
- of the awards went to companies based in another country
- 5%
As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.
Register