Pre-judicial debt recovery services procurement for the local fee for collection and management of municipal waste

different companies won its awards

40

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

24%

of its calls state an estimated value

98%

Based on 54 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.7

of those lots received a single tender

35%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Lithuania · Business services

different companies won awards here

227

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

9%

buyers awarded contracts here

100

Based on 377 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

5.6

of those lots received a single tender

20%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

6%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.