Selection of a supplier equipping persons receiving social benefits in non-monetary form with goods and enabling payment for goods and services with a social card.

different companies won its awards

14

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

39%

of its calls state an estimated value

100%

Based on 18 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.4

of those lots received a single tender

28%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Lithuania · Health & social work

different companies won awards here

29

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

24%

buyers awarded contracts here

16

Based on 37 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.0

of those lots received a single tender

20%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

6%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.