Subministrament Gradient forming equipment

different companies won its awards

37

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

21%

of its calls state an estimated value

77%

Based on 43 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

of the awards went to companies based in another country

9%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Spain · Laboratory & precision equipment

different companies won awards here

1,477

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

4%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

1,395 of 1,444

buyers awarded contracts here

789

Based on 2,965 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.9

of those lots received a single tender

52%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

9%

of the tenders came from another country

7%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.