România - Utilaje agricole sau forestiere specializate - Echipament pentru întreţinerea fâşiei de frontieră (mulcer) - Echipament autopropulsat pentru lucrări de defrişare a vegetaţiei

different companies won its awards

47

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

28%

of its calls state an estimated value

77%

Based on 90 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.9

of those lots received a single tender

24%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Romania · Agricultural machinery

different companies won awards here

51

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

18%

buyers awarded contracts here

38

Based on 71 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.6

of those lots received a single tender

48%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

of the tenders came from another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.