Skip to content
Aperlena

TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU) verified 1 day ago Contract award

Poland - Various spare parts - Supply of materials and parts for medical equipment Task 1 - Supply and service of computer equipment in medical apparatus

Original Polska - Różne części zapasowe - Dostawa materiałów i części do aparatury medycznej Zad. 1 - Dostawa i usługa serwisowa sprzętu komputerowego w aparaturze medycznej

Awarded Poland Śląskie Transport equipment & vehicles

Buyer Górnośląskie Centrum Medyczne im. prof. Leszka Gieca Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach

€92,801 awarded value

Key facts

Published
Procedure
Open procedure
  1. Published
  2. Awarded pending

TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU) does not publish the date of this award. See the official notice

View the official notice Watch this tender

Bidding is closed. An award or a correction on this notice: an email when the register sees it. Log in

Awarded to

F.H.U. CONTRAKT ADAM GOIK

Awarded value
€92,801
Bid received
1 A single tender

Summary

Machine-generated summary

The Upper Silesian Medical Centre named after Professor Leszek Giec, Silesian Medical University in Katowice, awarded a contract for the supply of materials and parts for medical equipment, Task 1, covering the supply and service of computer equipment used in medical apparatus. Partial bids were not allowed. The contract was won by F.H.U. CONTRAKT ADAM GOIK for EUR 92,800.97. Offers were evaluated on the hourly repair labour rate (40%), the travel rate (40%) and the delivery deadline for partial orders (20%). The buyer did not foresee repeat orders under Article 214(1)(7) and (8) of the Polish Public Procurement Law.

Description

Przedmiotem zamówienia jest: Dostawa materiałów i części do aparatury medycznej Zad. 1 - Dostawa i usługa serwisowa sprzętu komputerowego w aparaturze medycznej Zamawiający nie dopuszcza składania ofert częściowych. Szczegółowy opis przedmiotu zamówienia zawierają Załączniki 2b i 3 do SWZ. 3.3. Zamawiający wymaga realizacji przedmiotu zamówienia na zasadach określonych w umowie. Projektowane postanowienia umowy w sprawie zamówienia publicznego, które zostaną wprowadzone do umowy stanowią załączniki do SWZ. INFORMACJA O PRZEWIDYWANYCH ZAMÓWIENIACH, O KTÓRYCH MOWA W ART. 214 UST. 1 PKT 7 I 8, JEŻELI ZAMAWIAJĄCY PRZEWIDUJE UDZIELANIE TAKICH ZAMÓWIEŃ Zamawiający nie przewiduje udzielania zamówień, o których mowa w art. 214 ust. 1 pkt 7 ustawy Pzp. Zamawiający nie przewiduje udzielania zamówień, o których mowa w art. 214 ust. 1 pkt 8 ustawy Pzp. 13. OPIS KRYTERIÓW, KTÓRYMI ZAMAWIAJĄCY BĘDZIE SIĘ KIEROWAŁ PRZY WYBORZE OFERTY, WRAZ Z PODANIEM WAG TYCH KRYTERIÓW I SPOSOBU OCENY OFERT 13.1. Ocena ofert zostanie przeprowadzona na podstawie kryteriów określonych w SWZ oraz ich wag. Oferty oceniane będą punktowo. W trakcie oceny ofert kolejno rozpatrywanym i ocenianym ofertom przyznawane są punkty za poniższe kryteria według następujących zasad: W odniesieniu do wszystkich zadań KRYTERIUM STAWKA ROBOCZOGODZINY ZA NAPRAWĘ w odniesieniu do poz. 2 formularza cenowego waga: 40 % KRYTERIUM STAWKA ZA DOJAZD w odniesieniu do poz. 2 formularza cenowego waga: 40 % KRYTERIUM TERMIN WYKONANIA ZAMÓWIENIA CZĄSTKOWEGO waga: 20 %

Terms of the procedure

How tenders are scored
Price: 40 points; Price: 40 points; Cost: 20 points

As the official notice states them.

Official source

Source: TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU)

Always verify details on the official notice.

Report an error in this notice

Last verified against TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU) 1 day ago

What this buyer has paid before

Based on 5 comparable contracts this buyer awarded in this sector over the last 4 years.

This award
€92,801
Median award
€6,664
Middle half of past awards
€4,925 to €13,574

The award is larger than three in four past awards.

Most recent awards

Award values as published by the official sources. Use them as a guide, not a rule: scope, lots and duration differ between contracts.

Górnośląskie Centrum Medyczne im. prof. Leszka Gieca Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach

Poland

notices in the register
1,445
awards
778
awarded in total
€173.5M

Who wins its contracts

Many suppliers
different companies won its awards
533
of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
3%
of its calls state an estimated value
0%

Based on 682 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)
1.4
of those lots received a single tender
73%
of the awards went to companies based in another country
1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

One dot per award, on the day it was signed, sized by its value. A ring is an award with no published value.

Awards most often to

  1. URTICA Sp. z o.o. 10 awards €3.7M
  2. Medtronic Poland Sp. z o.o. 7 awards €4.4M
  3. EUVIC SOLUTIONS S.A. 5 awards €2.2M

26 open tenders right now

Market context

open now in Transport equipment & vehicles
4,463
median open notice
€249,000

Who wins in this market

Many suppliers

Poland · Transport equipment & vehicles

different companies won awards here
1,887
of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
7%
buyers awarded contracts here
2,303

Based on 4,430 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)
2.1
of those lots received a single tender
40%
of the awards went to companies based in another country
2%
of the tenders came from another country
4%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Procedure facts

  • A single tender was received (open procedure).

Facts that procurement researchers and journalists track across public records. None of them is evidence of wrongdoing: each has ordinary explanations, such as a specialised market, an urgent need or a short list of qualified suppliers.

Similar tenders

Open now

Awarded before

Never miss a tender like this

422 new notices in Transport equipment & vehicles in Poland in the last 7 days. Get an email when new ones appear. Free.

Set up my alert

Or follow just its CPV code, Miscellaneous spare parts: an email when new tenders arrive under it, no account needed.

Keyboard shortcuts

Read a list without reaching for the mouse. The shortcuts stay quiet while you type in a field.

j
Next result
k
Previous result
Enter
Open the result
n
Next page
p
Previous page
c
Compare this result
s
Shortlist this result
o
Open the result in a new tab
x
Set this result aside
/
Search from any page
Ctrl K
Search from any page
?
Show these shortcuts
Esc
Close

Index

Close
Log in

Language