Polska - Części maszyn używanych w rolnictwie i leśnictwie - Dostawa narzędzi i elektronarzędzi z akcesoriami na potrzeby jednostek organizacyjnych RZGW w Krakowie

different companies won its awards

881

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

3%

of its calls state an estimated value

32%

Based on 1,173 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

6.9

of those lots received a single tender

10%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Poland · Agricultural machinery

different companies won awards here

295

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

9%

buyers awarded contracts here

394

Based on 488 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.3

of those lots received a single tender

28%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

4%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.