TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU)verified 2 days agoPrior information notice
Norway - Medical software package - Prior information notice: Electronic board for FACT to health authorities in The South Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Upcoming
Norway
Oslo og VikenSoftware & IT systems
Norway - Medical software package - Prior information notice: Electronic board for FACT to health authorities in The South Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority.
Buyer: SYKEHUSINNKJØP HF; Sykehuspartner HF
Country: Norway
Procedure: Other procedure
Sector (CPV): Software & IT systems (48180000)
Aperlena: https://aperlena.com/en/t/norway-medical-software-package-prior-information-notice-electronic-board-for-fact-to-health-authorities-in-the-sou-6457915b6e
Official notice: https://ted.europa.eu/en/notice/-/detail/739734-2025
We email you if the deadline moves or a correction is published. Free.
Log in
01
Summary
Machine-generated summary
Helse Sør-Øst, the South Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, is preparing the procurement of an electronic board for FACT, a medical software system used in connection with health services. Before publishing the tender, the contracting authority invites potential suppliers and other interested parties to a market dialogue and welcomes written input on the planned procurement. Feedback is requested on the tenderer's experience with FACT boards and customer base, system features and benefits, support for sensitive patient-related purposes, delivery and operating models such as SaaS, possible environmental requirements, price models and factors affecting price, quality and information security measures, system hosting location, and support and training offered to users.
02
Description
Tenderers are hereby invited to a market dialogue in connection with the procurement of an electronic board for FACT to health companies in the Helse Sør-Øst Market dialogue, which is a part of the preliminary work for the procurement and is being carried out because the Contracting Authority would like input for the procurement from potential suppliers, possibly also from other interested parties. As a part of this process, suppliers are invited to provide input to the procurement prior to the announcement. The Contracting Authority requests written input on as many of the following points as possible: Short presentation of interested party: Description of experience with the Fact Board. What does the tenderer consider to be its core activity and main competence? Tenderers are requested to give a short description of customers who currently use the system, including possibly which parts of the system are used and for which user groups. Points we would like feedback on: Give a description of the tenderer ́s system and how this covers the needs/purposes described. What are the main features and advantages? What type of delivery model/operational model can be delivered (SaaS, other)? Does the tenderer have input on how any environmental requirements can be set for the system? Price models: Which price models do the tenderer operate with and what price models do the supplier recommend? Can the supplier comply with other models if the contracting authority sees it appropriate? What factors affect the price of the tenderer's system? Quality and security: What requirements do the tenderer have in relation to quality of the system? What measures does the tenderer have that ensure that information security and privacy are safeguarded, with particular focus on sensitive areas such as patient safety? Where is the solution installed? Where are the personnel operating and maintaining the system? What kind of support and training do the service provider offer to ensure users get the most out of their solution? Which support and maintenance services does the tenderer offer? Other: How does the supplier work on innovation and further development of the product? How does the supplier ensure that the systems remain relevant in line with technological developments in the market? Are there special developments in the market that the Contracting Authority ought to take into consideration in designing a future-oriented agreement? Which SSA templates think the tenderer is best suited for the delivery and why? Are there any other elements that the contracting authority should pay particular attention to? What should, in accordance with the tenderer ́s view, be emphasised in any future procurement? Furthermore, it may be of interest, if relevant for interested party, to hear about the tenderer's experience from similar public tenders, possibly in comparable countries (preferably countries within the EU). Deadline for written feedback from interested parties: 19.11.2025 This is only a prior information notice to get information on the market and to have a dialogue with relevant suppliers. The actual competition may be announced at a later date. Sykehusinnkjøp HF is assisting Sykehuspartner HF and HSØ with implementation of the market dialogue. See the www.sykehuspartner.no and www.helse-sorost.noFor further information about the contracting authority, please register or questions about the market survey in the Mercell communication module. After this market survey, the contracting authority will assess the need to hold meetings(s) with relevant interested parties.
Official source
Source: TED - Tenders Electronic Daily (Publications Office of the EU)
Based on 50 awards with a linked company profile over the last 2 years.
04
Market context
open now in Software & IT systems
3,145
median open notice
€555,942
Who wins in this market
Many suppliers
Norway · Software & IT systems
different companies won awards here
35
of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
24%
buyers awarded contracts here
40
Based on 50 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable.
Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.
Competition
of the awards went to companies based in another country
2%
As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.