Procurement of training services 'Developing competences using visual thinking strategies and applying them in literature lessons'

different companies won its awards

33

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

26%

of its calls state an estimated value

3%

Based on 42 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.9

of those lots received a single tender

33%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Lithuania · Education & training

different companies won awards here

49

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

15%

buyers awarded contracts here

17

Based on 60 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.1

of those lots received a single tender

45%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.