Mise à disposition d’un Learning Management System

different companies won its awards

102

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

5%

of its calls state an estimated value

1%

Based on 112 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

of the awards went to companies based in another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

France · Software & IT systems

different companies won awards here

384

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

6%

winners of the last 12 months were new here

273 of 300

buyers awarded contracts here

366

Based on 498 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners. New: no award from the same buyer or market in the two years before.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.9

of those lots received a single tender

21%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

4%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.