Latvia - Software development services - Implementation and maintenance of a working time planning tool

different companies won its awards

36

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

21%

of its calls state an estimated value

69%

Based on 43 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.7

of those lots received a single tender

15%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · IT services

different companies won awards here

109

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

12%

buyers awarded contracts here

78

Based on 139 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.9

of those lots received a single tender

34%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

15%

of the tenders came from another country

6%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.