Assessment of support improvement for families with children to prevent termination of custody rights

different companies won its awards

33

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

22%

of its calls state an estimated value

86%

Based on 45 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.2

of those lots received a single tender

25%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Research & development

different companies won awards here

67

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

20%

buyers awarded contracts here

36

Based on 94 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.7

of those lots received a single tender

31%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

15%

of the tenders came from another country

23%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.