Management of ship-generated waste under Annex I of the MARPOL 73/78 Convention at the Port of Liepaja

different companies won its awards

7

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

69%

of its calls state an estimated value

4%

Based on 13 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.2

of those lots received a single tender

18%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Environment, sewage & cleaning

different companies won awards here

177

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

17%

buyers awarded contracts here

109

Based on 400 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.8

of those lots received a single tender

15%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.