Latvija - Kapsētu uzturēšanas pakalpojumi - “Salacgrīvas, Stienūžu, Liepupes, Ainažu un Kuiķules kapu apsaimniekošana

different companies won its awards

81

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

17%

of its calls state an estimated value

0%

Based on 139 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.9

of those lots received a single tender

20%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Other community services

different companies won awards here

27

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

18%

buyers awarded contracts here

20

Based on 34 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.6

of those lots received a single tender

23%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

of the tenders came from another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.