Latvia - Development consultancy services - Development and approval of a description of the quality monitoring system in long-term social care and social rehabilitation service institutions

different companies won its awards

13

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

23%

of its calls state an estimated value

95%

Based on 13 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Latvia · Research & development

different companies won awards here

67

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

20%

buyers awarded contracts here

36

Based on 94 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

2.7

of those lots received a single tender

31%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

15%

of the tenders came from another country

23%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.