Eesti - Arhitektuuri-, insener-tehnilise projekteerimise ja planeerimisteenused - Lasnamäe uue põhikooli rajamise (Martsa tn) ideekonkurss

different companies won its awards

28

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

18%

of its calls state an estimated value

15%

Based on 33 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.9

of those lots received a single tender

8%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

3%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Estonia · Architecture & engineering services

different companies won awards here

133

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

14%

buyers awarded contracts here

50

Based on 338 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

6.7

of those lots received a single tender

3%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

4%

of the tenders came from another country

31%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.