Digitālās tiešsaistes kiberkrāpšanas novēršanas rīka izstrāde un atbalsta pakalpojuma sniegšana

different companies won its awards

24

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

16%

of its calls state an estimated value

57%

Based on 25 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.3

of those lots received a single tender

40%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

18%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Software & IT systems

different companies won awards here

41

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

16%

buyers awarded contracts here

28

Based on 49 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.6

of those lots received a single tender

45%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

18%

of the tenders came from another country

19%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.