Development of construction intent documentation for an asphalted active recreation area under the LEADER project 'Creation of an Active Recreation Area'

different companies won its awards

31

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

23%

of its calls state an estimated value

13%

Based on 44 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

3.0

of those lots received a single tender

8%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Architecture & engineering services

different companies won awards here

270

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

10%

buyers awarded contracts here

100

Based on 787 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

4.0

of those lots received a single tender

9%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

of the tenders came from another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.