Skip to content
Aperlena

Record

Awards by year

  1. 2026 82 awards €79.5M
  2. 2025 71 awards €16.1M
  3. 2024 2 awards €1.3M
  4. 2023 6 awards €20.6M
  • €2.0M
  • €20.0M
  • largest, €38.4M

Each dot is one award, placed on its date and sized by its value. Where a year holds more than 80 awards, its 80 largest are drawn.

Relations

Who wins with this buyer

  1. GIGA MULTIMEDIA Eugeniusz Sienicki 15 contracts 3.5% €146,769
  2. Eugeniusz Sienicki GIGA MULTIMEDIA 12 contracts 2.8% €260,226
  3. Bronikowski Paweł PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO HANDLOWE „SEA” 9 contracts 2.1% €44,161
  4. ASCOMP K Krzysztof Ćwiklak vel Ćwikliński 8 contracts 1.9% €29,990
  5. Usługi Transportowe Zofia Wisińska 7 contracts 1.6%
  6. Syriana Joanna Fischer 6 contracts 1.4% €118,372
  7. Przedsiębiorstwo Handlowe „SEA” Paweł Bronikowski 5 contracts 1.2% €41,376
  8. Helica Sp. z o. o. 4 contracts 0.9% €688,915

Shares of the 428 awards this buyer made to a named company.

Practice

How it buys

Publishing rhythm

Publishes most in July and September.

Next likely wave: July 2027.

Typical contract value
€7,054
Median of the last 58 priced notices

Based on 1,081 notices over the last 24 months.

What to expect from this buyer

Measured in its busiest sector Office & computing machinery

Typical final price against the published estimate
+12.1%

Medians across the 78 comparable awards this buyer made in this sector over the last 5 years. Each figure uses the awards that publish the dates or values it needs.

Next 90 days

Coming up from this buyer

See its forecast
tenders announced in advance (last 6 months)
0
contracts due back on the market in the next 90 days
11

Scorecard

The buyer in figures

How it runs its calls for tender

usual bidding window
12 days
of followed deadlines were extended
0%
0 of 113
of its calls state an estimated value
2%
How we count

Estimates over its calls for tender of the last 3 years, bidding windows over the last 2. Deadline extensions only where the source updates a notice in place (TED publishes corrections as separate notices, so its buyers show none).

Who wins its contracts

Many suppliers
different companies won its awards
320
of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
8%
of its calls state an estimated value
2%
How we count
Based on 428 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)
2.0
of those lots received a single tender
35%
of the awards went to companies based in another country
1%
How we count
As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Register

Tenders from this buyer

Keyboard shortcuts

Read a list without reaching for the mouse. The shortcuts stay quiet while you type in a field.

j
Next result
k
Previous result
Enter
Open the result
n
Next page
p
Previous page
c
Compare this result
s
Shortlist this result
o
Open the result in a new tab
x
Set this result aside
/
Search from any page
Ctrl K
Search from any page
?
Show these shortcuts
Esc
Close

Index

Close
Log in

Language