Kirkkonummen kunta
78 notices in the register, 2 open now. 16 contracts awarded, worth €23.5M in all.
Main sectors Construction work 31, Architecture & engineering services 14, Business services 4, Office & computing machinery 4, Financial & insurance services 3, Health & social work 3
Record
Awards by year
- 2026 6 awards €950,000
- 2025 6 awards €21.1M
- €1.0M
- €10.0M
- largest, €13.1M
- value not published
Each dot is one award, placed on its date and sized by its value.
Relations
Who wins with this buyer
- Mijorak Oy; Mirlux Oy; Notocom OY; Oy Kiinteistöpalvelu ETS Fastighetsservice Ab; Oy Malgon Ltd; Rakennus ja Lvi Oy Ehrnsten; Rakennuspalvelu SALMIMÄKI Oy; SRG-Urakointi Oy; Uudenmaan Automatiikkahuolto Oy; Paretec Oy; IO Control Finland Oy 1 contract €13,080,000
- Mehiläinen Oy 1 contract €6,000,000
- Visma Aquila Oy 1 contract €1,400,000
- Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia 1 contract €1,362,000
- Lappset Group Oy; LeikkiSet Oy; Kompan Suomi Oy; Oy J-Trading Ab; Finncont Ympäristötuotteet Oy; Lehtovuori Oy 1 contract €600,000
- CAPEX advisors Oy 1 contract €369,825
- LVI-neloset Oy 1 contract €350,000
- Call Waves Solutions Finland Oy 1 contract €252,000
Shares of the 14 awards this buyer made to a named company.
Practice
How it buys
Publishing rhythm
Publishes most in September and March.
Next likely wave: March 2027.
- Typical contract value
- €300,000
- Median of the last 28 priced notices
Based on 67 notices over the last 24 months.
Next 90 days
Coming up from this buyer
- tenders announced in advance (last 6 months)
- 0
- contracts due back on the market in the next 90 days
- 1
Scorecard
The buyer in figures
How it runs its calls for tender
- usual bidding window
- 26 days
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 29%
Estimates over its calls for tender of the last 3 years, bidding windows over the last 2. Deadline extensions only where the source updates a notice in place (TED publishes corrections as separate notices, so its buyers show none).
Who wins its contracts
Many suppliers- different companies won its awards
- 14
- of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
- 21%
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 29%
Based on 14 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.
Competition
- of the awards went to companies based in another country
- 0%
As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.
Register