Gmina Sulechów
71 notices in the register, 2 open now. 32 contracts awarded, worth €12.2M in all.
Main sectors Construction work 41, Architecture & engineering services 11, Repair & maintenance services 6, Environment, sewage & cleaning 5, Agricultural & forestry services 2, Financial & insurance services 2
Record
Awards by year
- 2026 0 awards
- 2025 1 award €11.6M
- €1.0M
- €10.0M
- largest, €11.6M
Each dot is one award, placed on its date and sized by its value.
Relations
Who wins with this buyer
- Firma „EKO-JANAS” Jarosław Janas 3 contracts
- Sulechowskie Przedsiębiorstwo Komunalne „SuPeKom” Sp. z o. o 2 contracts €613,193
- Instalatorstwo Elektryczne Henryk Okupski 2 contracts
- Zakład Ogólnobudowlany Grzegorz Buda 2 contracts
- Przedsiębiorstwo Drogowo-Budowlane „SPIDBUD” Daria Krawczyk 2 contracts
- B+C EKO ENERGIA sp. z o.o. 1 contract €11,579,246
- M&G REMONTY MATEUSZ GODEK 1 contract
- "BUDMIL" PRZEDSIĘBIORSTWO PROJEKTOWO-BUDOWLANE Ryszard Kifert 1 contract
Shares of the 29 awards this buyer made to a named company.
Practice
How it buys
Publishing rhythm
Publishes most in January and February.
Next likely wave: January 2027.
- Typical contract value
- €306,246
- Median of the last 5 priced notices
Based on 71 notices over the last 24 months.
Scorecard
The buyer in figures
How it runs its calls for tender
- usual bidding window
- 15 days
- of followed deadlines were extended
- 0%
- 0 of 10
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 5%
Estimates over its calls for tender of the last 3 years, bidding windows over the last 2. Deadline extensions only where the source updates a notice in place (TED publishes corrections as separate notices, so its buyers show none).
Who wins its contracts
Many suppliers- different companies won its awards
- 23
- of the awards went to the three most frequent winners
- 24%
- of its calls state an estimated value
- 5%
Based on 29 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.
Register