Lithuania - Network equipment - Network equipment expansion (open competition)

different companies won its awards

317

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

37%

of its calls state an estimated value

51%

Based on 975 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.6

of those lots received a single tender

26%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Lithuania · Radio, TV & communication equipment

different companies won awards here

64

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

28%

buyers awarded contracts here

51

Based on 160 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.4

of those lots received a single tender

41%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

1%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.