Latvija - Lauksaimniecības tehnika - Uzkarināmo pļaujmašīnu un lapu sūcēja iegāde

different companies won its awards

7

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

58%

of its calls state an estimated value

13%

Based on 12 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.5

of those lots received a single tender

11%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.

Latvia · Agricultural machinery

different companies won awards here

25

of the awards went to the three most frequent winners

26%

buyers awarded contracts here

19

Based on 38 awards with a named winner over the last 3 years. Counted by award, not by value, because lot and framework amounts are not comparable. Concentrated means the three most frequent winners took 65% or more of the awards; many suppliers, under 35% with at least ten different winners.

Competition

tenders per lot on average (open and restricted procedures)

1.9

of those lots received a single tender

42%

of the awards went to companies based in another country

0%

of the tenders came from another country

2%

As the official award notices state them, over the last 3 years. Tenders per lot count open and restricted procedures only: in a negotiated procedure or a direct award a single tender is the procedure itself. The country is the one the notice gives for the winner.